Home

Advertisement

Customize

Are you the marrying kind?

« previous entry | next entry »
Apr. 9th, 2007 | 08:28 pm
mood: contemplative contemplative

As the fact that I am in my late twenties is staring me in the face, I am bound to think about matrimony in general. I have begun to question the very concept of marriage. No wonder in the ancient times, our ancestors insisted on early marriages – probably they knew that if people hit their late twenties or early thirties – with a few strands of grey hair or receding hairlines - and could think in more vivid and experienced terms, they might end up giving a thumbs down to the whole affair.

According to me, a few reasons for which people marry (in full consciousness or otherwise)

Parental pressure: Understandable in the “Great Indian” context.

Love: The next logical step, they say. I would say a live-in relationship is good enough.

Need for companionship: A pet may not suffice for all people at all times. Also, who laid down the rule that the choice of companion should be driven by sexuality? Why do heterosexual people choose companions of the opposite sex and homosexuals, people of the same sex? Is marriage driven by the need for sexual fulfillment alone then?

Preemptive avoidance of repentance: Most people actually regret getting married and not the other way round!

Peer pressure: I would rather not analyze this.

Sex: Net present value of paid sex is cheaper over a lifetime, when compared to the planned and unforeseen amounts of money spent on a spouse.

Kids: Adoption is always an option

I am not taking sides here – there is no right or wrong reason to marry. We always don’t need a valid reason for everything too. Ever heard of someone who got married on a whim? Or by accident when mucking around?

Also, ever wondered what will happen to the zillions of melodramas wetting our idiot boxes if the concept of marriage suddenly ceased to exist? The Indian Television Industry would declare bankruptcy. Housewives and retired husbands will have nothing to look forward to in life. Prospective vamps would be deprived of their role models – in terms of dressing and dramatizing (and traumatizing). Divorce lawyers, marriage counselors, marriage hall owners, band-wallas, would all end up jobless. Unemployment would soar. Shaadi.com would have long buried the idea of moving from a click-only to a click-and-brick model and bit the dust along with its numerous dot com cousins mushrooming by the hour. The nation’s economy would see doom. This is so truly hilariously amusing.

Marriage is an issue with serious societal, economic and financial ramifications (!). In spite of looking at it from all angles, I still cannot figure out why marriage is such an overhyped concept and tacitly misunderstood as mandatory.

To each his own.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {9}

wise thoughts sur!

from: anonymous
date: Apr. 12th, 2007 08:19 pm (UTC)
Link

i second all ur thoughts...ur rite abt ppl marrying for any or all of the above reasons, or sometimes u ask them and that is the time they actually start thinking :). So when u say mandatory, that sort of strikes me... i wish swimming (etc.) were made mandatory in my school, i was just a stupid kid in school when I actually dint realise what could be good for me, so later now i regret for not having learnt at that age, however if i was smart enough to hv foreseen the cons of swimming at that age, i prob would hv gone for it then, anwyays learning swimming is a very stupid ex to give, i am just thinking aloud that prob if a person is smart enough to foresee all the cons( i would say pros too in this case ) then marriage not being mandatory perfectly makes sense!

Reply | Thread

Re: wise thoughts sur!

from: [info]juneflower
date: Apr. 14th, 2007 06:42 am (UTC)
Link

Hey Rash...I knew instantly it was you when I read this comment...well you are one of the privileged few who read my blog (hehehe).

And it is really self assuring to hear that my thoughts are wise ;) Well I am not sure if they are...I have been accused of being too outright and blunt at times :D

I can see the point you are trying to make about missing out things which we should have done...and not done...there are always regrets in life...but it is best to make sure that we are solely responsible for our deeds and be accountable for the repercussions. Getting into a blamegame hardly helps!

Reply | Parent | Thread

abt prev. comment

from: anonymous
date: Apr. 12th, 2007 08:20 pm (UTC)
Link

btw i posted the earlier one, just so that u know not some random person scraped and called u sur :)
-rashmi.

Reply | Thread

hmm...

from: anonymous
date: Apr. 23rd, 2007 05:24 pm (UTC)
Link

Well... CAM! I wud say!

and before you ask what is CAM.. its Cudn't agree more!.. :P

BTW watching too much of SATC these days.. the title reminds me of one of the episodes.. :)

Reply | Parent | Thread

OC and options too

from: anonymous
date: May. 4th, 2007 09:07 am (UTC)
Link

good one this ...ha ha

i liked ur NPV take on paid sex...gave me a good laugh :-))

how come u dint take into account the 'opportunity cost' factor ...i mean settling with one can be equated to forgoing the option of settling with another.

and also how does one choose from all the options...like SRK said in his biggest hit ... kisi ke baal ache hai to kisi ke gaal.....kisi ke naak kisi ke hout ...kisi ke yeh ..kisi ke woh ;-)

Reply | Thread

Re: OC and options too

from: [info]juneflower
date: May. 4th, 2007 06:19 pm (UTC)
Link

:)

I was actually thinking of applying the Real Options Approach to find the Expanded NPV. But then it would mandate such a ruthless desecration of the tradition that the puritans would come chasing me (with homicidal purpose of course!)

Reply | Parent | Thread

Re: OC and options too

from: anonymous
date: May. 5th, 2007 02:55 pm (UTC)
Link

i'd imagine ur not the kind who really cares two hoots about puritans ...ur current blog entry wudnt have surfaced in which case ...

all kinds of analyses on marriage make interesting reading for the late 20 somethings .... any and every 'Approach' would be appreciated ;-)

Reply | Parent | Thread

(no subject)

from: anonymous
date: May. 25th, 2007 02:18 pm (UTC)
Link

Hey Surabhi..

Even I happen to be one of your priveleged readers :).. Marriage brings in a sense of security .Without commitment nothing works..be it marriage or a live in....No relationship is fun and peppy always..there are a lot of grey areas..but what matters is both of you dont have too much of a problem with the grey areas.....I think there s nothing wrong about marriage...the problem is with who you are getting married to and maybe the decision making process to get committed is indeed tedious.....

It is misunderstood as mandatory because of the obvious practical reasons -- social , emotional and financial security somebody default to take care of...to explore..to pick you when you are late ....be there when you fight with everybody else....to discuss....to have fun and definetly to fight and complain..and learn from...before marriage I was eternally in search and wild..but after marriage..i have mellowed down and feel my search has ended.....If with the right person..any relationship is really beautiful isnt it..:)

Vibha..

Reply | Thread

super duper

from: anonymous
date: Apr. 8th, 2008 03:12 pm (UTC)
Link

this one is awesome...ravi

Reply | Thread

Advertisement

Customize